The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 2nd, 2024, 9:40pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Bootstrapped switch body tie (Read 8734 times)
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Bootstrapped switch body tie
Nov 28th, 2013, 11:46pm
 
Hi all,


I was attending a talk by a distinguished professor a few days ago, and he was talking about bootstrapping for a switch. The question that came up was how do you tie the body terminal of your switch? The professor's answer was the best place to tie it is to ground.

Now I didn't think of it at the time, but now I'm wondering if there's going to be a reliability issue. The gate of a bootstrapped switch could be swinging as high as 2VDD, and if you tie the body to ground, you're going to have 2VDD across the oxide. To me that's a big no no. Does anybody have any comments on this (whether there is a reliability problem, or the best way to tie the switch body)?


thanks,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
rfmagic
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 64

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #1 - Nov 30th, 2013, 11:56am
 
I would say that the risk for potential breakdown is higher with the bulk connected to ground but there is some relaxation here. The voltage at the gate with the bootstrapping can reach 2VDD but this is peak-to-peak voltage. The rms will be much lower and from my experience it will not degrade reliability too much.

In my  personal opinion connecting the bulk to ground is not a good suggestion as you will break the bootstrapping mechanism. The Vt modulation will degrade the linearity performance of the switch. IF you connect the bulk to the source you have all the nodes "floating', maximizing the efficiency of the bootstrapping.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #2 - Dec 1st, 2013, 5:32pm
 
Hi rfmagic,


thanks for the reply. For the reliability part, my understanding is that it's not correct to look at the rms voltage. The reason is the time-to-failure of the device reduces exponentially with the gate voltage. i.e. having a duty cycle of 50% simply means your device will last 2x longer than the same device with a DC bias of 2VDD (as opposed to the same time as a DC bias of √2VDD.. That said, I have seen papers where their experimental data shows that if your signal is an RF signal, the time-to-failure is much longer (memory effects maybe?). My switching speed is on the order of a couple of hundred MHz.

I agree with you about the Vt modulation. However, if you connect the body to the source/drain, I believe there is a possibility of the junction diode turning on when the switch is supposed to be OFF. I have found a solution for my particular implementation of the bootstrapped switch, but it isn't pretty. My main question is really how come there is no reliability issue. Maybe its because the professor's work is too academic?


Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
boe
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 615

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #3 - Dec 2nd, 2013, 2:11am
 
Hi Aaron,
if Vgate>VDD, the switch is ON, so gate stress (in settled condition) relates to the channel voltage, not the bulk voltage.
- B O E
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #4 - Dec 2nd, 2013, 4:52pm
 
Hi boe,


sounds logical  ;) thanks


Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
RobG
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 569
Bozeman, MT
Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #5 - Jan 12th, 2014, 8:13pm
 
When boot strapped switching was new there was a lot of talk about reliability, but it must not be a problem given its ubiquitous use nowadays.

Excluding active circuits, the only way I know to tie the bulk to a non-ground place is to place two switches in series and tie the bulk to the center point. But then each switch has to be 2x wider to get the same overall resistance... I'm willing to bet you would get better performance by simply doubling the width of a single switch and leaving the bulk tied to ground.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #6 - Jan 13th, 2014, 7:05am
 
Thanks for the reply. I guess you're right about the reliability. Its just that I was thinking of other ways to tie the body, and I was wondering if the way the professor tied the body was the most common way.


Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #7 - Jan 13th, 2014, 6:33pm
 
If it is NMOS the bulk is already substrate to ground. Only PMOS will give you the freedom to float the bulk.

But thats a vanilla Nwell Psubstrate CMOS process.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #8 - Jan 13th, 2014, 9:20pm
 
I have access to deep nwell. Wouldn't that be common for ADC designs?


Aaron

edit: just realized I didn't mention anything about ADCs in this post...
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Bootstrapped switch body tie
Reply #9 - Jan 15th, 2014, 4:19pm
 
aaron_do wrote on Jan 13th, 2014, 9:20pm:
I have access to deep nwell. Wouldn't that be common for ADC designs?


Aaron

edit: just realized I didn't mention anything about ADCs in this post...


Depends on the process, its all connected together one way or another.

Even SOI has some coupling.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.