The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 21st, 2024, 8:26am
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation (Read 484 times)
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation
Reply #15 - Mar 26th, 2014, 11:30am
 
Heating?
I really doubt it.

Look at the time constants of your reference voltage and bandgap.

Also, the diodes in the BG often do not have their capacitance in the model, and if you have small bias current the time constants can be really off.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Lex
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 201
Eindhoven, Holland
Re: Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation
Reply #16 - Apr 2nd, 2014, 1:46am
 
I share skepticism with Jerry..
I have heard many designers excuse themselves with "thermal response, package stress, substrate noise" and other things that are difficult to check, while for most times the problem turned out to be obvious things like low PSRR, poor settling speed or capacitive coupling.

So how did you do the MC verification? How did you define in simulation whether the BGR is settled? Did you simulate long transients as your measurement result? Are all nodes settled in the simulation?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
RobG
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Bozeman, MT
Re: Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation
Reply #17 - Apr 2nd, 2014, 7:17am
 
Lex wrote on Apr 2nd, 2014, 1:46am:
I share skepticism with Jerry..
I have heard many designers excuse themselves with "thermal response, package stress, substrate noise" and other things that are difficult to check, while for most times the problem turned out to be obvious things like low PSRR, poor settling speed or capacitive coupling.


I'll add models to that list of things that get blamed when it is really a something in layout, or a heat gradient Wink. Whatever you think it is, definitely be skeptical of your hypothesis and verify it thoroughly.

rg
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation
Reply #18 - Apr 2nd, 2014, 5:14pm
 
http://electronicdesign.com/products/simulation-vs-silicon-avoid-costly-mistakes...

give that a read and see if it rings any bells on stuff you left out.

high impedance nodes with unaccounted for capacitance attached to it would be my best guess.

Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
boe
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 615

Re: Band gap +LDO transient measurement not in line with simulation
Reply #19 - Apr 7th, 2014, 4:05am
 
Hi,
I have already seen a circuit with a start-up time of about 10 seconds [sic!] due to charging of a cap with a MOS in sub-threshold region.
- B O E
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.