The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 7:31pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
which delay cell to choose for ring osc? (Read 4384 times)
archyst
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3
waterloo ontario
which delay cell to choose for ring osc?
Feb 17th, 2006, 12:18pm
 
I have a ring osc design project. The specs are

1.  span: 2.4G-2.424G
2. Kvco,60Mhz/V
3. Phase noise: <-85dbc/Hz@ 1Mhz offset
4. Voltage swing, bigger than 0.25V but cannot saturate
5. 2 stage

Cmosp18 tech. I am not sure about which kind of delay cell to choose, from 4, it should be an unsaturated one. Besides, in case I have choosed some circuit structure, how to size the transistors? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance
Back to top
 
 
View Profile archyst   IP Logged
judean1
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 5

Re: which delay cell to choose for ring osc?
Reply #1 - Mar 21st, 2006, 3:15am
 
Hi,
"Voltage swing, bigger than 0.25V but cannot saturate "
HOw about using a triode region load differential ring oscillator, but N>=3
Does it help?
Regards,
V
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
trond
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 168
Glasgow, Scotland
Re: which delay cell to choose for ring osc?
Reply #2 - Mar 21st, 2006, 5:27am
 
I don't have much experience with oscillators but I think using a ring osc. with a triode load of the delay stage will result in improved linearity as the voltage swings are lower than for a load in saturation (because the output swing is limited by the overdrive voltage of the load transistors). However, this means also transitions will be slower and the phase noise will be higher than for a saturated load delay stage where the output swing is higher. I might go with a differential inverter with a Maneatis load.  Judean1, may I ask why you would choose a triode load as I would like to learn more about different osc. topologies.

Sven
Back to top
 

osc.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
judean1
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 5

Re: which delay cell to choose for ring osc?
Reply #3 - Mar 22nd, 2006, 4:09am
 
Hi svensi,
Since the initial post was having this constraint of having "Voltage swing, bigger than 0.25V but cannot saturate ", thats why the triode load stage based delay cell.
Definitely any time Meanatis load will be a better option when it comes down to having lesser phase noise as the voltage swing is higher compared withthe triode load cell. Moreover the voltage swing can be  made independent of VDD variations by using the replica biasing circuitry, there by imporvising the noise performance with respect to the VDD variations.

V
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
archyst
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3
waterloo ontario
Re: which delay cell to choose for ring osc?
Reply #4 - Mar 22nd, 2006, 4:40pm
 
Thanks for all your reply!

To clarify a few points:

Actually I have tried both the maneatis and the diode loaded delay cell. However, both of them would only oscillate when there are at least three stages. In order to make the Ring oscillator oscillate at 2 stages, some positive feedback mechanisms have to be introduced, for example, a cross-coupled latch.  However, in this way, the osc will saturate and that is the tricky point. So what I am looking for is the delay cell that can introduce at least the 90 degree of phase shift in order to oscillate while without using latch in order to be unsaturated. Sound contradictory, ur

BTW, this is a research project, so the specs might not make any sense from the practical point of view.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile archyst   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.