The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 13th, 2024, 6:04pm
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
bdasim vs spectre (Read 24439 times)
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: bdasim vs spectre
Reply #15 - Feb 05th, 2010, 8:07am
 
Andrew Beckett wrote on Feb 5th, 2010, 2:15am:
Pancho Hideboo's reference was to another post which was discussing the behaviour in hspice.
It is wrong. See the left graph plot of the following.
http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1260585749/5#5

Here I compared time step behavior of HSPICE and Cadence Spectre
when "$bound_step" are used in addition to "@(timer)".

Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
michael chapman
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3

Re: bdasim vs spectre
Reply #16 - Feb 5th, 2010, 8:47am
 
Hi Mayank,

You wrote :-

Quote:
author=Mayank_Singh link=1264764783/0#12  try converging simultaneously wheile it's running tstab).


I don't understand this either. PSS does not converge (shooting method) until the tstab initial stabilization transient run is complete.

Quote:
2 doubts :---   1> When BDA generates the psfbin output, it generates period jitter, period jitter_flicker, and period jitter_white under the pnoise-SummaryStatistics.Pnoise section.  May i know what formula does bdasim use to compute these values ???


Please contact me directly and we can discuss.

I suggest that you use nutbin output format when running PSS/PNoise. If you do this then you will get separate plots of phase noise (white) and phase noise (white + flicker). These outputs are not available in psfbin format. Use BDA's Wavecrave waveform tool to view BDA's nutbin format.

Quote:
                        2> Do the PPV values under the section pnoise-NoiseSourceIntensityNoiseSensitivityandProduct.pnoise indicate ISFs [ impulse sensitivity functions ] at these nodes ??


Yes, they do.

Regards
Michael

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Andrew Beckett
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Life, don't talk to
me about Life...

Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK
Re: bdasim vs spectre
Reply #17 - Feb 6th, 2010, 6:44am
 
Pancho Hideboo,

I understand the confusion now. I was talking about using bound_step instead of @timer, whereas you were talking about using it as well as @timer. If using it instead of, the simulator has more freedom.

Regards,

Andrew.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Andrew Beckett
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Life, don't talk to
me about Life...

Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK
Re: bdasim vs spectre
Reply #18 - Feb 6th, 2010, 6:51am
 
Andrew Beckett wrote on Feb 5th, 2010, 2:15am:
You may also want to try APS. From MMSIM72, you can just use "spectre -aps" to run in APS mode


Had a bit of a brain blip earlier. That should have been spectre +aps not -aps.

Regards,

Andrew.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.